Background: Analyses of tackle parameters in injury situations have provided valuable information regarding men’s football. However, there are no similar data for women’s football.\ud\udObjective: To categorise the tackle mechanisms leading to injury in elite women’s football.\ud\udStudy design: Retrospective video analysis of injury situations.\ud\udMethods: Events associated with all reported injuries during six women’s top-level tournaments were analysed on video recordings for tackle parameters.\ud\udResults: More than half of all injuries were due to tackles from the side (52%, 103/200), whereas tackles from behind were much less commonly involved in injury situations (11%, 21/200). One-footed (65%, 130/200) and upper body (21%, 42/200) tackle actions were most common. Sliding-in tackles leading to injury were the least likely to be sanctioned by match referees. Tackling players (45%, 90/200) were almost as likely to be injured as the tackled player (55%).\ud\udConclusion: The present study found differences between injury mechanisms in women’s football and previously published data on men’s football. Further research, especially using video analysis, is needed for a better understanding of risk situations in football.
展开▼
机译:背景:受伤情况下铲球参数的分析提供了有关男子足球的宝贵信息。但是,没有关于女子足球的类似数据。\ ud \ ud目标:对导致精英女子足球受伤的铲球机制进行分类。\ ud \ ud研究设计:对受伤情况的回顾性视频分析。\ ud \ ud方法:与以下事件相关的事件在视频记录中分析了六名女子顶级比赛中所有报告的受伤情况,以了解钓具参数。\ ud \ ud结果:一半以上的受伤是由于侧面的钓具造成的(52%,103/200),而背后的钓具是受伤情况较少见(11%,21/200)。单脚(65%,130/200)和上半身(21%,42/200)铲球动作最为常见。导致裁判受伤的滑入式铲球受比赛裁判员制裁的可能性最小。解决问题的球员(45%,90/200)受伤的可能性几乎与被解决的球员(55%)一样。\ ud \ ud结论:本研究发现,女子足球的伤害机制与之前公布的男子足球的伤害机制不同。需要进一步研究,尤其是使用视频分析,才能更好地了解足球的风险情况。
展开▼